As expected, I had no lectures Thursday and Friday last week due to the faculties being barricaded. This continued today. No barricades were taken down at all, and the doors were only opened to allow people in to attend the AG at 12pm in the biggest lecture theatre. This is in a circular corridor called the rotonde (rotunda), which connect to the faculty buildings D and E on one side and A,B and C on the other. The protestors had also erected barricades of tables and chairs to either side of the lecture theatre doors in order to stop anyone wandering off into the other buildings. There were footprints on the floor leading to the theatre and it generally felt like we were being herded in! This lecture theatre is huge, I didn’t take my camera but I wish I had because it is really difficult to describe just how many people there were. Hundreds, at least; on every bench, seat, wall, step and spilling out into the entrance passages and corridors outside. This movement has a far larger support than I had realised.
The meeting took two hours in the end; to begin with there were summaries from the leaders of the movement with regard to what has already happened during the movement, the result of recent demonstrations including numbers – apparently there were 3 million protestors across the country on Thursday in relation to this strike – plans for upcoming demonstrations, summaries from the other faculties, and meetings with the university president. Then the floor was opened for debate, with quite a few people stepping up to voice their opinions, although by the end it had become a rotation of the same few people. The vast majority made passionate speeches about how it was necessary to continue strike action no matter what; how the government must listen and that this is the only way to get the reforms thrown out. They left the floor to an uproar of applause and stamping of feet. The one or two who dared to take the stand against the strike movement barely got their sentences out before being booed and shouted down.
There were a few notable moments; one of the issues hotly debated today was that of the “semestre blanc” or void semester; essentially if the strike continues, it will be very difficult if not impossible to set any kind of meaningful assessment, and therefore validate the semester. For me this isn’t a great issue but for the permanent students it means making up that semester at some point in their degree. This week, following the blocages where no lectures at all have taken place, the presidence has voiced concerns about this resulting in a semestre blanc – and has been ridiculed by the strikers for this, because as they rightly point out many courses have been on strike, with no classes, for nearly 2 months now – which has a greater impact on the likelihood of a semestre blanc than 3 days blocage, and yet the presidence has only just started making noises. There seemed to be a conflict of information at the meeting today though; whereas one lecturer stood up and said that, legally because of the duration of the strike so far we are already categorically in a semestre blanc situation, another stood up and said that the students should not be worried because no matter what they would be awarded a grade and the semester would be validated. Personally I don’t see how this is possible. At one point a debating student turned to face the largest group of lecturers and accused them of urging the students to radicalise the strike movement (i.e blocages) in one moment and then cautioning them of the risk of a semestre blanc in the next. So there are slight cracks in the foundation of this strike, but they are very minor.
Finally after the debate came the voting. I abstained because obviously it’s unfair for me to vote on things that seriously affect the other students but not me; I was only there today as an information-gathering exercise. It was difficult to hear but the voting was split into three parts; the first vote was on whether to change the list of people who are allowed past the barricades. Last week it was something like lecturers, university personnel, library staff, master’s students, people supporting master’s theses, and the IUT staff. I’m not quite sure who the IUT people are, but anyway today they were voted off the list in order to force them to show solidarity with the strike movement, which they have up until now resisted. The second vote was on the general continuation of the strike, which was of course passed. And the third vote was on whether to continue the blocages, in this case until Thursday and the next AG. This was also passed, by an overwhelming majority and again to massive cheering and applause as it became clear. So barring any sudden changes, come Thursday I will have had no lectures for an entire week. I have already missed one mid-term and I will now miss another on Wednesday; as for the future it remains to be seen but I suspect the blocages will continue. I will go to the AG again on Thursday; it’s become more important now that I get a proper grasp on what’s happening, especially as I now won’t find out anything from classmates or lecturers because we won’t see each other. Next time I’ll take a camera and you’ll get an idea of this strike’s following.